The IChO syllabus sorts topics into three levels: level 1 is what most national school courses teach, level 2 is taught in many strong school courses, and level 3 goes beyond school and may only be used if the host country covers it in its preparatory problems. A Level 9701 covers almost all of level 1 and a good part of level 2, so you start well ahead. The new work is mainly quantitative physical chemistry, the theory behind inorganic structures, and the deeper organic mechanisms and spectroscopy that turn up in structure puzzles.
Go through the 45 topics below. Tick Got it when you are confident; topics marked New have a short bridge note to get you started.
0 of 45ticked
Study plan
Stage 1: Secure the school core4-6 weeks Make moles, titrations, equilibria and the A Level organic reactions fast and reliable. Do the feeder problems without notes.
Stage 2: Stretch physical chemistry6-8 weeks Link Gibbs energy to K and E, use integrated rate laws and the steady state, and solve acid-base and redox titration problems exactly.
Stage 3: Structure and inorganic theory6-8 weeks Learn MO theory, crystal field theory, unit cells and complex isomerism, and read IR and NMR spectra with confidence.
Stage 4: Contest organic and level 3 topics8-10 weeks Add stereochemistry, enolates and Diels-Alder, then quantum models, rotational spectra and enzyme kinetics. Work through past preparatory problems under time.
Stoichiometry and chemical analysis
Moles, concentration and titrationsIn your course
Fluent mole calculations, limiting reagents, percentage purity and acid-base titrations, including back titrations.
Redox titrations test balanced half-equations and multi-step mole ratios in a single question.
A redox titration works like an acid-base one, but the mole ratio comes from electrons. Write both half-equations, balance the electrons, then read off the ratio.
Manganate(VII) in acid: $\text{MnO}_4^- + 8\text{H}^+ + 5e^- \rightarrow \text{Mn}^{2+} + 4\text{H}_2\text{O}$. It is its own indicator: the first lasting pink is the end point.
Iodometry: an oxidant is added to excess iodide, which makes iodine. The iodine is titrated with thiosulfate, using starch near the end: $\text{I}_2 + 2\text{S}_2\text{O}_3^{2-} \rightarrow 2\text{I}^- + \text{S}_4\text{O}_6^{2-}$.
Olympiad problems often pass the electrons along a chain. In the Winkler method for dissolved oxygen, $\text{O}_2$ oxidises manganese(II), the manganese oxidises iodide, and the iodine is titrated. Each $\text{O}_2$ takes 4 electrons, so $1\ \text{O}_2 \equiv 4\ \text{S}_2\text{O}_3^{2-}$.
The quick way: count the electrons the analyte gives or takes, count the electrons the titrant takes or gives, and equate them. You do not need every intermediate equation if you trust the electron count.
Worked example
25.00 cm3 of an iron(II) solution needs 18.40 cm3 of 0.02000 mol dm-3 potassium manganate(VII) in acid. Find the concentration of $\text{Fe}^{2+}$.
Show the solution
Each $\text{Fe}^{2+}$ gives 1 electron and each $\text{MnO}_4^-$ takes 5, so the ratio is 5 : 1.
A 0.250 g piece of brass is dissolved. The $\text{Cu}^{2+}$ is treated with excess KI: $2\text{Cu}^{2+} + 4\text{I}^- \rightarrow 2\text{CuI} + \text{I}_2$. The iodine needs 31.50 cm3 of 0.1000 mol dm-3 thiosulfate. What is the percentage of copper by mass? ($A_r$ Cu = 63.55)
Show the answer
2 Cu gives 1 $\text{I}_2$, which needs 2 thiosulfate, so Cu : thiosulfate = 1 : 1. $n(\text{Cu}) = 3.150 \times 10^{-3}$ mol, mass = 0.2002 g, so copper is 80.1% of the brass.
Going deeper: An analytical chemistry textbook for first-year university students, chapters on redox titrations.
Complexometric (EDTA) titrationsNew
Titrating metal ions with EDTA, the role of pH and buffers, metal indicators, back titration and masking.
EDTA titrations are the standard way to measure metal ions such as calcium and magnesium, and they mix complex equilibria with stoichiometry.
EDTA is a hexadentate ligand: one ion wraps around a metal ion using two N and four O donor atoms. It is usually written $\text{H}_4\text{Y}$, and the fully deprotonated form $\text{Y}^{4-}$ is the one that binds.
Key facts:
EDTA reacts with almost every metal ion in a 1 : 1 ratio, whatever the charge on the metal. This makes the arithmetic easy.
The formation constants are large, but only the $\text{Y}^{4-}$ fraction binds. At low pH most EDTA is protonated, so titrations are buffered, often at pH 10 with ammonia. The effective (conditional) constant is $K' = \alpha_{\text{Y}^{4-}} K_f$.
A metal indicator such as Eriochrome Black T is a weaker ligand with a different colour when bound. At the end point EDTA has taken all the metal and the free indicator colour appears (wine red to blue for Eriochrome Black T).
Back titration: add a known excess of EDTA, then titrate the leftover EDTA with a standard $\text{Mg}^{2+}$ or $\text{Zn}^{2+}$ solution. This is used when the metal reacts slowly or has no good indicator, for example aluminium.
Masking: a second ligand, such as cyanide or fluoride, ties up an interfering ion so it does not react with EDTA.
Water hardness is reported as mg of $\text{CaCO}_3$ per dm3, as if all the $\text{Ca}^{2+}$ and $\text{Mg}^{2+}$ were calcium carbonate.
Worked example
A 50.00 cm3 sample of tap water at pH 10 needs 12.60 cm3 of 0.01000 mol dm-3 EDTA. Give the hardness in mg $\text{CaCO}_3$ dm-3. ($M$ = 100.09 g mol-1)
Show the solution
$n(\text{EDTA}) = 0.01260 \times 0.01000 = 1.260 \times 10^{-4}$ mol = $n(\text{M}^{2+})$, because the ratio is 1 : 1.
Concentration = $1.260 \times 10^{-4} / 0.05000 = 2.520 \times 10^{-3}$ mol dm-3. As $\text{CaCO}_3$: $2.520 \times 10^{-3} \times 100.09 = 0.2522$ g dm-3, so the hardness is about 252 mg dm-3.
Try it
A 0.1000 g sample containing aluminium is dissolved and 25.00 cm3 of 0.05000 mol dm-3 EDTA is added. The excess EDTA needs 9.80 cm3 of 0.04000 mol dm-3 $\text{Zn}^{2+}$. Find the percentage of Al by mass. ($A_r$ Al = 26.98)
Show the answer
EDTA added = $1.250 \times 10^{-3}$ mol; excess = $3.92 \times 10^{-4}$ mol; so Al = $8.58 \times 10^{-4}$ mol = 0.02315 g, which is 23.1% of the sample.
Going deeper: The complexometry chapter of a quantitative analysis textbook.
Qualitative analysis and ion testsIn your course
Identifying cations, anions and gases from precipitates, colours and gas tests, then using solubility rules to explain them.
Hybridisation, resonance and formal chargeGoes further
School introduces sigma and pi bonds and sp, sp2, sp3; the olympiad adds formal charges, resonance structures and delocalisation in ions such as carbonate and nitrate.
Lines ending on $n_1 = 1$ are in the ultraviolet (Lyman series); lines ending on $n_1 = 2$ are visible (Balmer series).
Ionisation from the ground state is $n = 1 \rightarrow \infty$: $13.6 Z^2$ eV per atom, or $1312 Z^2$ kJ mol-1.
Each orbital is labelled by $n$, $l$ (0 to $n-1$; s, p, d, f) and $m_l$ ($-l$ to $+l$), and each electron also has $m_s = \pm\tfrac{1}{2}$. Shell $n$ holds $n^2$ orbitals. An orbital has $n-1$ nodes in total: $l$ angular nodes and $n-l-1$ radial nodes. So 3p has one radial node and one angular node.
For many-electron atoms the formula is only a guide: inner electrons shield the nucleus, so use an effective $Z$.
Worked example
Find the wavelength of the line emitted when the electron in a hydrogen atom drops from $n = 3$ to $n = 2$.
Three things to notice. The lowest energy is not zero. Levels spread out as $n^2$. A longer box gives closer levels.
Conjugated molecules. Treat the delocalised $\pi$ electrons as moving freely along the chain of length $L$. Fill the levels two electrons at a time. With $N$ $\pi$ electrons ($N$ even), the highest occupied level is $n = N/2$ and the lowest empty one is $n = N/2 + 1$. The absorption that moves one electron up costs
and the absorbed wavelength is $\lambda = hc/\Delta E$. As the chain gets longer, $\lambda$ grows roughly like $L$, so long polyenes absorb visible light and look coloured (carotene is orange).
Model buta-1,3-diene (4 $\pi$ electrons) as a box of length 0.560 nm. Estimate the wavelength of its first absorption.
Show the solution
$N = 4$, so $\Delta E = \dfrac{5 h^2}{8 m_e L^2} = \dfrac{5 \times (6.626 \times 10^{-34})^2}{8 \times 9.109 \times 10^{-31} \times (5.60 \times 10^{-10})^2} = 9.61 \times 10^{-19}$ J.
$\lambda = \dfrac{hc}{\Delta E} = \dfrac{1.986 \times 10^{-25}}{9.61 \times 10^{-19}} = 2.07 \times 10^{-7}$ m, about 207 nm, in the ultraviolet. The measured value is close to 217 nm, so the crude model does well.
Try it
An electron is in a box 1.00 nm long. What wavelength of light moves it from $n = 1$ to $n = 2$?
Show the answer
$\Delta E = 3h^2/(8 m_e L^2) = 1.81 \times 10^{-19}$ J, so $\lambda = hc/\Delta E \approx 1.10 \times 10^{-6}$ m, about 1100 nm (infrared).
Going deeper: The quantum chemistry chapters of a first-year university physical chemistry text.
Molecular orbital theory for diatomicsNew
Building bonding and antibonding orbitals for second-period diatomic molecules and ions, bond order and magnetism.
MO theory explains facts that Lewis structures cannot, such as why oxygen is attracted to a magnet.
When two atomic orbitals overlap they make two molecular orbitals: a bonding one, lower in energy, with electron density between the nuclei, and an antibonding one (marked *), higher in energy, with a node between them.
For diatomics of the second period, the valence orbitals fill in this order:
A higher bond order means a shorter, stronger bond. Fill degenerate orbitals singly first (Hund's rule). Any unpaired electrons make the species paramagnetic. O2 has two unpaired electrons in $\pi^*_{2p}$, which a Lewis structure with a double bond does not show.
Removing an electron from an antibonding orbital strengthens the bond; removing one from a bonding orbital weakens it. So the bond order of $\text{O}_2^+$ is 2.5, while that of $\text{O}_2^{2-}$ is 1.
Worked example
Find the bond order of the superoxide ion $\text{O}_2^-$ and say whether it is paramagnetic.
Show the solution
It has 13 valence electrons: $\sigma_{2s}^2\ \sigma_{2s}^{*2}\ \sigma_{2p}^2\ \pi_{2p}^4\ \pi_{2p}^{*3}$.
Bonding = 8, antibonding = 5, so the bond order = $(8-5)/2 = 1.5$. The three $\pi^*$ electrons leave one unpaired, so $\text{O}_2^-$ is paramagnetic.
Try it
Which has the longer bond, N2 or $\text{N}_2^+$?
Show the answer
$\text{N}_2^+$. Its electron is lost from the bonding $\sigma_{2p}$ orbital, so the bond order falls from 3 to 2.5 and the bond gets longer.
Going deeper: An inorganic chemistry text for first-year university students, chapter on molecular orbitals.
Thermodynamics and phase equilibria
Enthalpy changes and Hess's lawIn your course
Calorimetry, standard enthalpy changes, Hess cycles from formation and combustion data, and bond energies.
Bomb calorimeters measure internal energy, not enthalpy, and olympiad problems expect you to convert between them.
The first law: the internal energy of a system changes by the heat put in plus the work done on it.
$$\Delta U = q + w$$
Signs: $q \gt 0$ when heat flows in, $w \gt 0$ when work is done on the system. A gas expanding against a constant outside pressure does work on the surroundings, so $w = -p_{\text{ext}}\Delta V$.
At constant volume (a sealed bomb calorimeter) no expansion work is done, so $q_V = \Delta U$.
At constant pressure (an open beaker) $q_p = \Delta H$, where $H = U + pV$.
For a reaction involving gases: $\Delta H = \Delta U + \Delta n_{\text{gas}} RT$, where $\Delta n_{\text{gas}}$ is moles of gaseous products minus gaseous reactants. Liquids and solids hardly change volume, so ignore them.
Reversible isothermal expansion of an ideal gas: $w = -nRT \ln(V_2/V_1)$, and $\Delta U = 0$, so $q = -w$.
Heat capacity $C_p$ tells you how $H$ changes with temperature. For a reaction, Kirchhoff's law gives $\Delta H(T_2) = \Delta H(T_1) + \Delta C_p (T_2 - T_1)$.
Watch units: $R = 8.314$ J K-1 mol-1, so convert to kJ before adding to a value in kJ.
Worked example
A bomb calorimeter gives $\Delta U = -885.0$ kJ mol-1 for $\text{CH}_4(g) + 2\text{O}_2(g) \rightarrow \text{CO}_2(g) + 2\text{H}_2\text{O}(l)$ at 298 K. Find $\Delta H$.
Show the solution
Gas moles: 1 on the right, 3 on the left, so $\Delta n_{\text{gas}} = -2$.
Linking Gibbs energy to K turns thermodynamic data into a prediction of how far a reaction goes, which is the heart of many IChO questions.
You know $\Delta G^\circ = \Delta H^\circ - T\Delta S^\circ$ and that a negative $\Delta G^\circ$ means a feasible reaction. The olympiad adds three links.
Gibbs energy and K: $\Delta G^\circ = -RT \ln K$. A negative $\Delta G^\circ$ means $K \gt 1$; every 5.7 kJ mol-1 at 298 K is a factor of 10 in $K$.
Away from standard conditions: $\Delta G = \Delta G^\circ + RT \ln Q$. The reaction runs forwards while $Q \lt K$, and $\Delta G = 0$ at equilibrium.
Cells: $\Delta G^\circ = -nFE^\circ$, so $\ln K = nFE^\circ / RT$.
Putting 1 and the definition of $\Delta G^\circ$ together, and assuming $\Delta H^\circ$ and $\Delta S^\circ$ do not change with temperature, gives the van 't Hoff equation:
So a plot of $\ln K$ against $1/T$ is a straight line of gradient $-\Delta H^\circ/R$. For an exothermic reaction $K$ falls as $T$ rises, which is Le Chatelier's principle made quantitative.
The common slip: $\Delta S^\circ$ is in J K-1 mol-1 and $\Delta H^\circ$ in kJ mol-1. Convert before you combine them.
Worked example
A gas-phase reaction has $\Delta H^\circ = -60.0$ kJ mol-1 and $\Delta S^\circ = -150$ J K-1 mol-1. Find $K$ at 298 K, and the temperature at which $K = 1$.
$\ln K = 15\,300 / (8.314 \times 298) = 6.18$, so $K \approx 481$.
$K = 1$ when $\Delta G^\circ = 0$: $T = 60\,000/150 = 400$ K. Above 400 K the products are no longer favoured.
Try it
For the same reaction, find $K$ at 350 K.
Show the answer
$\Delta G^\circ = -60\,000 + 350 \times 150 = -7500$ J mol-1; $\ln K = 7500/(8.314 \times 350) = 2.58$, so $K \approx 13$. It has fallen, as expected for an exothermic reaction.
Going deeper: A first-year university physical chemistry text, chapters on the second law and chemical equilibrium.
Phase diagrams, vapour pressure and colligative propertiesNew
Reading phase diagrams, the Clausius-Clapeyron equation, Raoult's law, and using freezing point, boiling point and osmotic pressure to find molar masses.
Colligative properties give a way to find molar mass and the number of particles a solute makes, a favourite IChO data puzzle.
A phase diagram plots pressure against temperature. The lines show where two phases coexist; the triple point is where all three do; beyond the critical point liquid and gas cannot be told apart.
Vapour pressure rises steeply with temperature. The Clausius-Clapeyron equation gives the change:
Raoult's law: in an ideal solution the vapour pressure of component A is $p_A = x_A p_A^*$, where $x_A$ is its mole fraction and $p_A^*$ the pure value.
Colligative properties depend only on the number of solute particles, not their identity:
Freezing point depression: $\Delta T_f = i K_f b$
Boiling point elevation: $\Delta T_b = i K_b b$
Osmotic pressure: $\Pi = i c R T$
Here $b$ is molality (mol of solute per kg of solvent), $c$ is concentration (mol m-3 in SI units), and $i$ is the van 't Hoff factor: about 2 for NaCl, 3 for $\text{CaCl}_2$, 1 for sugar, and less than 1 for a solute that pairs up (dimerises). For water, $K_f = 1.86$ K kg mol-1.
Worked example
2.00 g of a non-electrolyte dissolved in 50.0 g of water lowers the freezing point by 0.620 K. Find its molar mass.
School uses half-lives of first-order reactions; the olympiad uses the full concentration-time equations for zero, first and second order and pseudo-order tricks.
Real kinetics data come as concentration against time, and the integrated laws let you find the order and k from one run.
A rate equation tells you the rate at one instant. Integrating it gives concentration as a function of time, for a reaction $\text{A} \rightarrow$ products with rate $= k[\text{A}]^n$:
To find the order, test which plot is straight. Only for first order is the half-life independent of the starting concentration; this is why radioactive decay has a fixed half-life.
Pseudo-first-order trick: if rate $= k[\text{A}][\text{B}]$ and B is in large excess, $[\text{B}]$ hardly changes, so the reaction behaves as first order in A with $k' = k[\text{B}]_0$. Run it again with a different excess of B to get $k$.
Check the rate definition in each problem. For $2\text{A} \rightarrow$ products, some books write $-\tfrac{1}{2}\,d[\text{A}]/dt = k[\text{A}]^2$, which puts a factor of 2 into the integrated law.
Worked example
A first-order reaction has $k = 2.50 \times 10^{-3}$ s-1. How long does it take for 80% of the reactant to be used up?
IChO often gives a mechanism and asks you to show it fits the observed rate law, which needs these two approximations.
A mechanism lists elementary steps. For each elementary step the rate law follows from the equation itself: $\text{A} + \text{B} \rightarrow$ products has rate $k[\text{A}][\text{B}]$. Intermediates must not appear in the final rate law, so you eliminate them.
Pre-equilibrium. If a fast reversible step comes before a slow one, treat the fast step as being at equilibrium. For $\text{A} + \text{B} \rightleftharpoons \text{I}$ (constant $K$) then $\text{I} \rightarrow \text{P}$ (slow, $k_2$):
$$[\text{I}] = K[\text{A}][\text{B}], \qquad \text{rate} = k_2 K [\text{A}][\text{B}]$$
Steady state. A reactive intermediate is used up as fast as it forms, so its concentration stays small and roughly constant: set $d[\text{I}]/dt = 0$. For $\text{A} + \text{B} \rightleftharpoons \text{I}$ ($k_1$, $k_{-1}$) and $\text{I} + \text{C} \rightarrow \text{P}$ ($k_2$):
Always look at the limits. If $k_2[\text{C}] \gg k_{-1}$, the rate becomes $k_1[\text{A}][\text{B}]$ (the first step is rate-determining). If $k_2[\text{C}] \ll k_{-1}$, it becomes $(k_1/k_{-1})k_2[\text{A}][\text{B}][\text{C}]$, the pre-equilibrium result. A rate law with a sum in the denominator is a clue that a steady state is involved.
Worked example
For $2\text{NO} + \text{O}_2 \rightarrow 2\text{NO}_2$, a proposed mechanism is $2\text{NO} \rightleftharpoons \text{N}_2\text{O}_2$ (fast, $K = 5.0 \times 10^{-2}$ dm3 mol-1) then $\text{N}_2\text{O}_2 + \text{O}_2 \rightarrow 2\text{NO}_2$ (slow, $k_2 = 4.0 \times 10^{3}$ dm3 mol-1 s-1). Find the rate law and the observed rate constant.
Show the solution
Pre-equilibrium: $[\text{N}_2\text{O}_2] = K[\text{NO}]^2$, so rate $= k_2[\text{N}_2\text{O}_2][\text{O}_2] = k_2 K [\text{NO}]^2[\text{O}_2]$.
The reaction is third order overall, with $k_{\text{obs}} = k_2 K = 4.0 \times 10^{3} \times 5.0 \times 10^{-2} = 200$ dm6 mol-2 s-1.
Try it
In the Lindemann mechanism, $\text{A} + \text{M} \rightleftharpoons \text{A}^* + \text{M}$ ($k_1$, $k_{-1}$) and $\text{A}^* \rightarrow \text{P}$ ($k_2$). Use the steady state on $\text{A}^*$ to find the rate, and its order in A at high pressure (large $[\text{M}]$).
Show the answer
Rate $= \dfrac{k_1 k_2 [\text{A}][\text{M}]}{k_{-1}[\text{M}] + k_2}$. At high pressure $k_{-1}[\text{M}] \gg k_2$, so rate $\approx (k_1 k_2/k_{-1})[\text{A}]$: first order in A.
Going deeper: The reaction mechanisms chapter of a university physical chemistry or kinetics text.
Catalysis and enzyme kineticsNew
How catalysts change a mechanism, the Michaelis-Menten equation, finding KM and Vmax from data, and the effect of inhibitors.
At low $[\text{S}]$ the rate is first order in S; at high $[\text{S}]$ the enzyme is saturated and the rate levels off at $V_{\max}$ (zero order in S).
When $[\text{S}] = K_M$, $v = V_{\max}/2$. A small $K_M$ means the enzyme works well at low substrate concentration.
$k_2$ is also called the turnover number $k_{\text{cat}}$: substrate molecules converted per enzyme per second.
Taking reciprocals gives a straight line (Lineweaver-Burk): $\dfrac{1}{v} = \dfrac{K_M}{V_{\max}}\cdot\dfrac{1}{[\text{S}]} + \dfrac{1}{V_{\max}}$. The intercept gives $V_{\max}$ and the gradient gives $K_M/V_{\max}$.
A competitive inhibitor competes for the active site: $V_{\max}$ is unchanged but the apparent $K_M$ grows. A non-competitive inhibitor lowers $V_{\max}$.
Worked example
An enzyme has $V_{\max} = 8.0$ $\mu$mol min-1 and $K_M = 2.0$ mmol dm-3. Find the rate when $[\text{S}] = 6.0$ mmol dm-3.
Show the solution
$v = \dfrac{8.0 \times 6.0}{2.0 + 6.0} = \dfrac{48}{8.0} = 6.0$ $\mu$mol min-1, three quarters of $V_{\max}$.
Try it
At what substrate concentration, in terms of $K_M$, does an enzyme run at 90% of $V_{\max}$?
Olympiad acid-base questions are set where the school shortcut fails, so you need to know when to solve the full equation.
The school shortcut for a weak acid HA at concentration $c$ is $[\text{H}^+] \approx \sqrt{K_a c}$. It assumes that only a little of the acid dissociates. Check it: if $[\text{H}^+]$ comes out more than about 5% of $c$, solve the quadratic instead:
$$K_a = \frac{x^2}{c - x} \ \Rightarrow\ x^2 + K_a x - K_a c = 0$$
Other cases to know:
Weak base: use $K_b = K_w / K_a$ of its conjugate acid, find $[\text{OH}^-]$, then pH = 14 - pOH at 298 K.
Polyprotic acids ($\text{H}_2\text{A}$): if $K_{a1} \gg K_{a2}$, the first step sets the pH, and $[\text{A}^{2-}] \approx K_{a2}$.
Amphiprotic salts such as $\text{NaHA}$: $\text{pH} \approx \tfrac{1}{2}(\text{p}K_{a1} + \text{p}K_{a2})$, almost independent of concentration.
Very dilute strong acid (below about $10^{-6}$ mol dm-3): water's own $\text{H}^+$ matters. A $10^{-8}$ mol dm-3 HCl solution is not pH 8; it is just below 7.
The safe general method is to write the mass balance (all forms of A add to $c$) and the charge balance (positive charge = negative charge), then simplify by dropping terms that are clearly small. Always check the dropped terms afterwards.
Worked example
Find the pH of 0.0100 mol dm-3 HA with $K_a = 1.0 \times 10^{-3}$ mol dm-3.
Show the solution
The shortcut gives $x = \sqrt{1.0 \times 10^{-5}} = 3.2 \times 10^{-3}$, which is 32% of $c$, far too much. Solve the quadratic:
Going deeper: The acid-base equilibria chapters of an analytical chemistry textbook.
Solubility, precipitation and complex formationGoes further
Beyond Ksp and the common ion effect: deciding whether a precipitate forms, selective precipitation, and how complex formation or pH changes solubility.
Electrode potentials, Nernst and Latimer diagramsGoes further
School covers standard potentials and the Nernst equation; the olympiad combines potentials through Gibbs energy, uses Latimer diagrams and shows how precipitation or complexation shifts a potential.
Electrochemistry joins thermodynamics and equilibrium, and IChO uses it to predict which oxidation states survive in solution.
The key link is $\Delta G^\circ = -nFE^\circ$, with $F = 96\,485$ C mol-1.
Combining half-reactions. Potentials do not add, but Gibbs energies do. To get a new half-reaction from two others, add the $nE^\circ$ values and divide by the new $n$:
Latimer diagrams write the oxidation states of one element in a row, highest on the left, with $E^\circ$ for each step above the arrow. A species disproportionates if the potential to its right is more positive than the potential to its left.
Nernst equation at 298 K:
$$E = E^\circ - \frac{0.0592}{n}\log_{10} Q$$
and at equilibrium $E_{\text{cell}} = 0$, which gives $\ln K = nFE^\circ_{\text{cell}}/RT$.
Shifting potentials. If the reduced form is removed by precipitation or complexation, its concentration falls, $Q$ falls and the couple becomes more oxidising. Copper(I) is unstable in water, but CuI is so insoluble that $\text{Cu}^{2+}$ can oxidise iodide. The new standard potential for $\text{Cu}^{2+} + \text{I}^- + e^- \rightarrow \text{CuI}$ follows from the Nernst equation with $[\text{Cu}^+] = K_{sp}/[\text{I}^-]$.
Worked example
Given $E^\circ(\text{Fe}^{3+}/\text{Fe}^{2+}) = +0.77$ V and $E^\circ(\text{Fe}^{2+}/\text{Fe}) = -0.44$ V, find $E^\circ(\text{Fe}^{3+}/\text{Fe})$.
Show the solution
Add the Gibbs energies: $n_3 E^\circ_3 = (1)(0.77) + (2)(-0.44) = -0.11$ V, and $n_3 = 3$.
$E^\circ_3 = -0.11/3 = -0.037$ V. Simply adding the potentials (0.33 V) would be wrong.
Try it
An element X has $E^\circ(\text{X}^{2+}/\text{X}^+) = +0.20$ V and $E^\circ(\text{X}^+/\text{X}) = +0.45$ V. Does $\text{X}^+$ disproportionate in water? Find $K$ for $2\text{X}^+ \rightleftharpoons \text{X}^{2+} + \text{X}$ at 298 K.
Show the answer
Yes: the potential on the right (+0.45 V) is more positive than on the left (+0.20 V). $E^\circ_{\text{cell}} = 0.25$ V, $n = 1$, $\ln K = 0.25 \times 96\,485/(8.314 \times 298) = 9.74$, so $K \approx 1.7 \times 10^{4}$.
Going deeper: The electrochemistry chapters of an inorganic or physical chemistry university text.
Electrolysis and Faraday's lawsIn your course
Predicting electrolysis products and calculating masses and volumes from charge passed.
Coordination compounds: naming and isomersGoes further
School covers ligands, shapes and simple isomerism; the olympiad adds systematic naming, counting all stereoisomers and deducing formulas from conductivity or precipitation data.
Naming complexes and counting their isomers is a quick test of how well you can picture shapes in 3D.
Naming. In a formula, the complex goes in square brackets. In the name:
List ligands in alphabetical order, ignoring the number prefixes (di-, tri-, tetra-). Neutral ligands have special names: aqua ($\text{H}_2\text{O}$), ammine ($\text{NH}_3$), carbonyl (CO). Anionic ligands end in -ido or -o: chlorido, cyanido, hydroxido, oxalato.
Then the metal, with its oxidation state in Roman numerals. If the whole complex is an anion, the metal takes -ate, often with the Latin root: ferrate, cuprate, argentate.
Name the cation before the anion, as for any salt.
Counting stereoisomers (A and B are monodentate, AA is bidentate like ethane-1,2-diamine, en):
Square planar $\text{MA}_2\text{B}_2$: cis and trans (2).
Octahedral $\text{MA}_4\text{B}_2$: cis and trans (2). $\text{MA}_3\text{B}_3$: fac and mer (2).
Octahedral $\text{M(AA)}_3$: a pair of non-superimposable mirror images (2).
Octahedral $\text{M(AA)}_2\text{B}_2$: trans, plus a chiral cis pair (3).
Werner's method. Only ions outside the brackets are free in solution. Adding silver nitrate precipitates only the free chloride, and the conductivity tells you how many ions one formula unit gives.
Worked example
A solid has the formula $\text{CrCl}_3 \cdot 5\text{H}_2\text{O}$. One mole of it gives two moles of AgCl at once with excess silver nitrate. Write the formula of the complex, name it and say how many stereoisomers it has.
Show the solution
Two chlorides are free, so one chloride is a ligand. The other five sites hold water: $[\text{Cr}(\text{H}_2\text{O})_5\text{Cl}]\text{Cl}_2$.
Name: pentaaquachloridochromium(III) chloride. An $\text{MA}_5\text{B}$ octahedron has only one arrangement, so there are no stereoisomers.
Try it
How many stereoisomers does $[\text{Co(en)}_2\text{Cl}_2]^+$ have?
Show the answer
Three: one trans isomer and a pair of cis enantiomers.
Going deeper: A university inorganic chemistry text, chapters on coordination chemistry.
Crystal field theory and magnetismGoes further
School shows the d orbitals splitting to explain colour; the olympiad adds high and low spin, crystal field stabilisation energy, the spectrochemical series and magnetic moments.
Crystal field theory explains the colour, magnetism and even the structures of transition-metal compounds with one simple picture.
In an octahedral complex, the six ligands raise the energy of the d orbitals that point at them. The five d orbitals split into a lower set of three, $t_{2g}$, and an upper set of two, $e_g$. The gap is $\Delta_o$.
Each $t_{2g}$ electron lowers the energy by $0.4\Delta_o$; each $e_g$ electron raises it by $0.6\Delta_o$. The total is the crystal field stabilisation energy (CFSE).
For $d^4$ to $d^7$ there is a choice. If $\Delta_o$ is bigger than the pairing energy $P$, electrons pair up in $t_{2g}$ (low spin); if smaller, they spread out (high spin).
The size of $\Delta_o$ depends on the ligand, in the spectrochemical series: I- < Br- < Cl- < F- < OH- < H2O < NH3 < en < CN- < CO. It also grows with the metal's charge and down a group.
Tetrahedral complexes split the other way round, with $\Delta_t \approx \tfrac{4}{9}\Delta_o$, so they are almost always high spin.
The spin-only magnetic moment is $\mu = \sqrt{n(n+2)}$ Bohr magnetons, where $n$ is the number of unpaired electrons.
CFSE also explains site choices in solids: in spinels, an ion with a large octahedral CFSE (such as $d^6$ $\text{Fe}^{2+}$ or $d^3$ $\text{Cr}^{3+}$) prefers the octahedral holes.
Worked example
Compare $[\text{Fe(CN)}_6]^{4-}$ and $[\text{Fe(H}_2\text{O)}_6]^{2+}$: give the configuration, CFSE (ignore pairing energy) and spin-only magnetic moment of each.
Show the solution
Both contain $\text{Fe}^{2+}$, $d^6$.
Cyanide is strong field, so low spin: $t_{2g}^6$. CFSE = $6 \times (-0.4\Delta_o) = -2.4\Delta_o$. No unpaired electrons, so $\mu = 0$ (diamagnetic).
Water is weaker, so high spin: $t_{2g}^4 e_g^2$. CFSE = $4(-0.4\Delta_o) + 2(0.6\Delta_o) = -0.4\Delta_o$. Four unpaired electrons, so $\mu = \sqrt{24} = 4.90$ BM.
Try it
Find the CFSE and spin-only magnetic moment of high-spin octahedral $\text{Mn}^{2+}$.
Show the answer
$d^5$ high spin is $t_{2g}^3 e_g^2$: CFSE = $3(-0.4) + 2(0.6) = 0$. Five unpaired electrons give $\mu = \sqrt{35} = 5.92$ BM.
Going deeper: A university inorganic chemistry text, chapters on bonding in transition-metal complexes.
Crystal structures and unit cellsNew
Counting atoms in cubic unit cells, linking density to cell size, and describing ionic structures by the holes they fill.
Unit-cell geometry links an X-ray measurement to density, atomic size and formula, which makes it ideal for calculation problems.
A crystal is a repeating 3D pattern. The smallest repeating box is the unit cell. For a cube of edge $a$, count the atoms that belong to one cell:
corner atom: shared by 8 cells, counts $\tfrac{1}{8}$; edge: $\tfrac{1}{4}$; face: $\tfrac{1}{2}$; body centre: 1.
Simple cubic: $Z = 1$. Body-centred cubic (bcc): $Z = 2$. Face-centred cubic (fcc, also called cubic close packed): $Z = 4$.
Atoms touch along the line where they are closest: the edge in simple cubic ($a = 2r$), the body diagonal in bcc ($\sqrt{3}a = 4r$), and the face diagonal in fcc ($\sqrt{2}a = 4r$).
The density follows from the mass in one cell divided by its volume:
$$\rho = \frac{Z M}{N_A a^3}$$
Use $a$ in cm to get g cm-3 (1 nm = $10^{-7}$ cm).
Ionic solids are often a close-packed array of anions with cations in the holes. An fcc array of 4 anions has 4 octahedral holes and 8 tetrahedral holes. NaCl: $\text{Na}^+$ in all octahedral holes ($Z = 4$ formula units). Zinc blende ZnS: $\text{Zn}^{2+}$ in half the tetrahedral holes. CsCl is different: simple cubic $\text{Cl}^-$ with $\text{Cs}^+$ at the body centre. The formula always follows from the ratio of ions in one cell.
Worked example
A metal of molar mass 100 g mol-1 crystallises fcc with $a = 0.400$ nm. Find its density and atomic radius.
Show the solution
$a = 4.00 \times 10^{-8}$ cm, so $a^3 = 6.40 \times 10^{-23}$ cm3.
Substitution and elimination mechanismsGoes further
School covers SN1 and SN2; the olympiad adds E1 and E2, Zaitsev and Hofmann products, solvent effects, carbocation rearrangements and choosing between the four.
Predicting whether a halogenoalkane substitutes or eliminates, and with what stereochemistry, is a core organic skill at every olympiad.
A halogenoalkane meeting a nucleophile or base has four main options.
SN2: one step, the nucleophile attacks from the back as the leaving group goes. Rate $= k[\text{RX}][\text{Nu}^-]$. The stereocentre is inverted. Fastest for methyl and primary carbons; blocked by crowding. Polar aprotic solvents (propanone, DMSO) help because they do not shield the nucleophile.
SN1: the leaving group leaves first to give a carbocation, then the nucleophile adds. Rate $= k[\text{RX}]$. A stereocentre is racemised. Favoured by tertiary carbons and polar protic solvents (water, alcohols).
E2: one step, a base removes an H on the carbon next door while the leaving group goes. The H and the leaving group must be anti-periplanar (on opposite sides, in one plane). Favoured by strong bases and heat.
E1: carbocation first, then loss of H+. Competes with SN1, favoured by heat.
Which alkene? Normally the more substituted alkene is the main product (Zaitsev). A bulky base such as potassium tert-butoxide removes the most accessible H instead, giving the less substituted alkene (Hofmann).
Rearrangements. A carbocation can become more stable by moving a neighbouring H or methyl group with its pair of electrons (a 1,2-shift), for example secondary to tertiary. Products of SN1 and E1 can therefore have a different carbon skeleton from the starting material.
Worked example
2-Bromo-2-methylbutane is heated with potassium hydroxide in ethanol. Name the main product, and say how the result changes with potassium tert-butoxide.
Show the solution
A tertiary halide, a strong base and heat give elimination (E2). H can be lost from C1 or C3.
With KOH the more substituted alkene, 2-methylbut-2-ene, is the main product (Zaitsev). With bulky tert-butoxide the more accessible C1 hydrogens are removed, so 2-methylbut-1-ene becomes the main product (Hofmann).
Try it
(R)-2-Bromobutane reacts with sodium cyanide in DMSO. Name the product and give its configuration.
Show the answer
SN2 with inversion gives 2-methylbutanenitrile. CN takes the highest priority, as Br did, so the inverted product is (S)-2-methylbutanenitrile.
Going deeper: A university organic chemistry textbook, chapters on nucleophilic substitution and elimination.
Stereochemistry: R/S, E/Z and counting stereoisomersGoes further
School identifies chiral centres and cis-trans isomers; the olympiad needs Cahn-Ingold-Prelog priorities to assign R/S and E/Z, meso compounds and the difference between enantiomers and diastereomers.
Olympiad structure questions ask for the exact configuration of each product, so naming stereocentres must become automatic.
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog (CIP) priorities rank the groups on a stereocentre or a double-bond carbon:
Look at the atom directly attached: higher atomic number wins (Br > Cl > O > N > C > H).
If two are tied, list the atoms attached to each and compare them in order, highest first. Keep going outwards until there is a difference.
A double bond counts as two single bonds: C=O is treated as C bonded to O, O.
R or S. Turn the molecule so the lowest-priority group points away from you. Trace 1 → 2 → 3. Clockwise is R, anticlockwise is S. If the lowest group points towards you, the answer is the reverse.
E or Z. On each carbon of the double bond pick the higher-priority group. Same side is Z, opposite sides is E. This works where cis and trans become unclear.
Counting. $n$ stereocentres give at most $2^n$ stereoisomers. Fewer exist when the molecule has internal symmetry: a meso compound has stereocentres but a mirror plane, so it is not chiral. Stereoisomers that are mirror images are enantiomers; all other stereoisomer pairs are diastereomers, which have different physical properties.
Worked example
In one enantiomer of lactic acid, $\text{CH}_3\text{CH(OH)COOH}$, with H pointing away from you, the path OH → COOH → $\text{CH}_3$ runs clockwise. Is it R or S?
Show the solution
Priorities: OH (O, atomic number 8) is first. COOH and $\text{CH}_3$ both attach through C, so look further: COOH has (O, O, O), $\text{CH}_3$ has (H, H, H), so COOH is second, $\text{CH}_3$ third and H fourth.
H points away and 1 → 2 → 3 is clockwise, so this is (R)-lactic acid.
Try it
How many stereoisomers does 2,3-dibromobutane have?
Show the answer
Three: the (R,R) and (S,S) enantiomers, and the meso (R,S) form, which has a mirror plane.
Going deeper: A university organic chemistry textbook, chapter on stereochemistry; a molecular model kit helps a lot.
Aromatic substitution and directing effectsGoes further
School covers nitration, halogenation and Friedel-Crafts on benzene; the olympiad adds how substituents activate or deactivate the ring and direct new groups to ortho, meta or para positions.
Making carbon-carbon bonds is how chemists build molecules, and most olympiad synthesis problems use one of these reactions.
You know that nucleophiles attack the $\delta+$ carbon of C=O. The olympiad adds two ideas: carbon nucleophiles, and the carbon next to C=O (the alpha carbon) acting as a nucleophile itself.
Grignard reagents $\text{RMgBr}$, made from a halogenoalkane and magnesium in dry ether, behave like $\text{R}^-$. Followed by dilute acid:
methanal gives a primary alcohol; other aldehydes give secondary alcohols; ketones give tertiary alcohols;
carbon dioxide gives a carboxylic acid with one more carbon;
esters react twice, giving a tertiary alcohol with two identical R groups.
Enolates. An H on the alpha carbon is weakly acidic (p$K_a$ about 20 for a ketone, about 11 between two C=O groups) because the anion is shared between C and O. The enolate is a carbon nucleophile.
Aldol addition: the enolate of one aldehyde or ketone attacks the C=O of another, giving a $\beta$-hydroxy carbonyl compound. Heating removes water to give an $\alpha,\beta$-unsaturated carbonyl (aldol condensation).
Claisen condensation: an ester enolate attacks another ester; alkoxide leaves; the product is a $\beta$-keto ester.
Michael addition: an enolate adds to the end carbon of an $\alpha,\beta$-unsaturated carbonyl. A Michael addition followed by an intramolecular aldol makes a new six-membered ring (the Robinson annulation).
Worked example
Ethanal is treated with dilute sodium hydroxide, and the product is then heated. Give both products.
Show the solution
Hydroxide removes an alpha H from one ethanal to give $^-\text{CH}_2\text{CHO}$. This attacks the C=O of a second ethanal; protonation gives 3-hydroxybutanal, $\text{CH}_3\text{CH(OH)CH}_2\text{CHO}$.
On heating, water is lost between C2 and C3 to give but-2-enal, $\text{CH}_3\text{CH=CHCHO}$.
Try it
Propanone reacts with methylmagnesium bromide, then dilute acid. Name the product.
Show the answer
A ketone plus a Grignard reagent gives a tertiary alcohol: 2-methylpropan-2-ol, $(\text{CH}_3)_3\text{COH}$.
Going deeper: A university organic chemistry textbook, chapters on enols, enolates and organometallic reagents.
Diels-Alder and other pericyclic reactionsNew
The Diels-Alder reaction, its stereochemistry and regiochemistry, and the idea of concerted cyclic electron shifts.
The Diels-Alder reaction makes a six-membered ring with up to four stereocentres in one step, so it turns up in many synthesis puzzles.
In a pericyclic reaction the electrons move round a closed loop in one step, with no intermediate. The most important one for you is the Diels-Alder reaction, a [4+2] cycloaddition:
A conjugated diene (4 $\pi$ electrons) reacts with a dienophile, an alkene or alkyne (2 $\pi$ electrons), to give a cyclohexene.
Two new C-C $\sigma$ bonds form; the new C=C sits between what were C2 and C3 of the diene.
The diene must be able to take the s-cis shape (both double bonds on the same side of the central bond). Cyclopentadiene is locked s-cis and is very reactive.
It goes fastest when the dienophile carries electron-withdrawing groups (CHO, COOR, CN) and the diene carries electron-donating ones.
Stereospecific: groups that are cis on the dienophile stay cis in the ring.
Endo rule: with cyclic dienes, the electron-withdrawing group usually ends up under the new ring (endo) in the main product.
To work backwards (retrosynthesis), find the C=C in the cyclohexene ring, count two bonds away from each end of it, and break those two ring bonds. The four-carbon piece holding the C=C was the diene; the other two carbons were the dienophile.
Other pericyclic reactions you may meet: electrocyclic ring closures and [3,3] sigmatropic rearrangements (Cope and Claisen).
Worked example
Give the product of buta-1,3-diene with propenal, $\text{CH}_2\text{=CHCHO}$.
Show the solution
The diene ends bond to the two alkene carbons of propenal, giving a six-membered ring with a C=C between the old C2 and C3 of the diene and the CHO on a ring carbon.
The product is cyclohex-3-ene-1-carbaldehyde.
Try it
Which diene and dienophile would you use to make 4-methylcyclohex-3-ene-1-carbonitrile?
Show the answer
2-Methylbuta-1,3-diene (isoprene) and propenenitrile, $\text{CH}_2\text{=CHCN}$.
Going deeper: A university organic chemistry textbook, chapter on pericyclic reactions.
Reaction pathways and multi-step synthesisIn your course
Planning two- to four-step routes between functional groups and identifying unknowns from their reactions.
It is the first step in every structure puzzle: one number from the formula rules out most candidates at once.
A saturated, acyclic hydrocarbon has the formula $\text{C}_n\text{H}_{2n+2}$. Every ring or $\pi$ bond removes two hydrogens. The degree of unsaturation (also called double bond equivalent, DBE) counts how many:
where $C$, $H$, $X$ (halogens) and $N$ are the numbers of each atom. Oxygen and sulfur do not change the count, so ignore them.
How to read the number:
each ring = 1; each C=C or C=O = 1; each triple bond (C≡C or C≡N) = 2;
a benzene ring = 4 (one ring and three C=C), so a DBE of 4 or more with 6 or more carbons suggests an aromatic ring;
DBE = 0 means no rings and no multiple bonds: alcohols, ethers, amines, alkanes.
The answer must be a whole number of 0 or more; if not, recheck the formula. Combine the DBE with the IR (is there a C=O?) and NMR (are there aromatic H near $\delta$ 7?) to decide where the unsaturation is.
Worked example
A compound has formula $\text{C}_8\text{H}_8\text{O}$ and a strong IR band at 1690 cm-1. What does the DBE suggest?
Show the solution
DBE = $8 - 4 + 1 = 5$. A benzene ring accounts for 4 and the C=O (IR at 1690 cm-1) for 1.
So it is an aromatic ketone or aldehyde, for example phenylethanone, $\text{C}_6\text{H}_5\text{COCH}_3$.
Try it
Find the DBE of $\text{C}_5\text{H}_9\text{N}$ and suggest one structure.
Going deeper: The structure determination chapter of a university organic chemistry textbook.
NMR spectroscopy in depthGoes further
School covers chemical shift, integration and the n+1 rule; the olympiad adds coupling constants, more complex splitting, symmetry and combining NMR with every other spectrum.
NMR is the most powerful tool for working out structures, and IChO problems expect you to read a spectrum without being told what to look for.
A 1H NMR spectrum gives four kinds of information:
Number of signals = number of different H environments. Use symmetry: in 1,4-dimethylbenzene all four ring H are the same.
Chemical shift $\delta$ (ppm) says what is nearby. Rough guide: alkyl 0.9-1.7; next to C=O 2.0-2.7; next to O (in alcohols, ethers, esters) 3.3-4.3; alkene 4.5-6.5; aromatic 6.5-8; aldehyde 9-10; carboxylic acid 10-12.
Integration gives the ratio of H in each environment.
Splitting: H on neighbouring carbons split a signal into $n+1$ lines. A triplet next to a quartet is the fingerprint of an ethyl group; an isolated $\text{CH}_3$ is a singlet.
The olympiad extras:
The gap between lines is the coupling constant $J$ (Hz). Two groups that split each other show the same $J$, which tells you which signals are neighbours.
If a H has two different sets of neighbours, the pattern multiplies: a doublet of doublets has four lines.
Trans H on an alkene couple more strongly ($J$ about 12-18 Hz) than cis H ($J$ about 6-12 Hz).
OH and NH signals are often broad and vanish when $\text{D}_2\text{O}$ is added.
Work in order: formula, then DBE, then IR, then NMR fragments, then join the fragments.
Worked example
A compound $\text{C}_4\text{H}_8\text{O}$ (IR band at 1715 cm-1) shows: $\delta$ 1.05 (triplet, 3H), 2.14 (singlet, 3H), 2.44 (quartet, 2H). Identify it.
Show the solution
DBE = 1, and the IR shows C=O. The triplet (3H) and quartet (2H) form an ethyl group; the quartet at 2.44 means the $\text{CH}_2$ is next to C=O. The singlet (3H) at 2.14 is a $\text{CH}_3$ on C=O with no neighbours.
The compound is butanone, $\text{CH}_3\text{COCH}_2\text{CH}_3$.
Try it
How many signals does 1,4-dimethylbenzene show in its 1H NMR spectrum, and in what ratio?
Show the answer
Two singlets: the six methyl H (near $\delta$ 2.3) and the four ring H (near $\delta$ 7.0), in the ratio 3 : 2.
Going deeper: A book on spectroscopic methods in organic chemistry, with plenty of practice spectra.
UV-visible spectroscopy and the Beer-Lambert lawNew
Absorbance, transmittance and the Beer-Lambert law for finding concentrations, and why compounds absorb at the wavelengths they do.
Spectrophotometry is the everyday way to measure concentration, and IChO practical and theory papers both use it.
When light passes through a solution, some is absorbed. If $I_0$ goes in and $I$ comes out:
$$T = \frac{I}{I_0}, \qquad A = \log_{10}\frac{I_0}{I} = -\log_{10} T$$
The Beer-Lambert law says absorbance is proportional to concentration and path length:
$$A = \varepsilon c l$$
Here $c$ is in mol dm-3, $l$ is the cell length in cm (usually 1.00 cm) and $\varepsilon$ is the molar absorption coefficient in dm3 mol-1 cm-1, a property of the substance at that wavelength.
A calibration line of $A$ against $c$ for standard solutions lets you read off an unknown. The law works best for $A$ below about 1.
Absorbances add: for a mixture, $A = (\varepsilon_1 c_1 + \varepsilon_2 c_2) l$. Measuring at two wavelengths gives two equations for two unknowns.
A compound looks the colour complementary to the one it absorbs: absorbing orange-red light makes a solution look blue-green.
Longer conjugated systems absorb at longer wavelength (see the particle in a box), and d-d transitions in complexes give the colours of transition-metal compounds.
Worked example
A dye has $\varepsilon = 1.20 \times 10^{4}$ dm3 mol-1 cm-1 at its peak. A solution in a 1.00 cm cell gives $A = 0.450$. Find its concentration.
where $\mu$ is the reduced mass. Spectra quote the wavenumber $\tilde{\nu} = \nu / c$ in cm-1. Stiffer bonds (triple bonds) and lighter atoms (H) give higher wavenumbers. Changing an isotope leaves $k$ the same, so $\tilde{\nu} \propto 1/\sqrt{\mu}$: swapping H for D lowers a C-H stretch by a factor of about 0.73.
Rotation. A diatomic molecule turning end over end has energies
$$E_J = hcB\,J(J+1), \qquad B = \frac{h}{8\pi^2 c I}, \qquad I = \mu r^2$$
with $J = 0, 1, 2, \dots$ and $B$ in cm-1 when $c$ is in cm s-1. Allowed jumps are $\Delta J = \pm 1$, so the pure rotational (microwave) spectrum is a row of lines spaced $2B$ apart. Measure the spacing, find $B$, then $I$, then the bond length $r$.
In a gas-phase IR spectrum, each vibrational jump comes with a rotational jump, giving two branches of lines on either side of the band centre, also spaced about $2B$ apart.
Use masses in kg: 1 u = $1.6605 \times 10^{-27}$ kg.
Worked example
A C-H stretch appears at 3000 cm-1. Estimate the C-D stretch, using atomic masses 12, 1 and 2.
The rotational lines of a diatomic molecule $^{12}\text{C}^{16}\text{O}$ are spaced 3.86 cm-1 apart. Find $B$ and the bond length.
Show the answer
$B = 1.93$ cm-1. $I = h/(8\pi^2 c B) = 1.45 \times 10^{-46}$ kg m2; $\mu = 6.86$ u $= 1.14 \times 10^{-26}$ kg; $r = \sqrt{I/\mu} \approx 1.13 \times 10^{-10}$ m = 113 pm.
Going deeper: The molecular spectroscopy chapters of a university physical chemistry text.
Contest skills
Keep a mole ledgerMost IChO calculations pass an amount through several steps. Write the mole ratio at each step and check that the electrons or atoms balance before you divide or multiply.
Units and constantsMixing J with kJ, or dm3 with m3, is the commonest way to lose marks. Write the unit next to every number and convert before combining.
Solving structure puzzlesProblems give a chain of unknowns, A to H, linked by reactions and spectra. Start from the compound you can pin down best, often from a formula and DBE, and work outwards from it.
Straight-line plotsTurn data into a straight line: ln k against 1/T, ln[A] against t, 1/v against 1/[S]. The gradient and intercept give the constants you need.
Sanity checksAsk whether an answer makes chemical sense: a pH above 7 for an acid, a yield above 100% or a negative bond order means an error. Check limiting cases, such as very dilute or very concentrated solutions.
Careful practical techniqueThe IChO practical exam rewards accurate titres and clean syntheses more than speed. Practise reading burettes, judging end points and recording results in a clear table.
Ready to practise?Problems with staged hints and a timed drill.IChO practice →